TSTP Solution File: SWV428^1 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SWV428^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n099.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 16:47:42 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.83s
% Output : FiniteModel 23.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV428^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n099.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 07:53:03 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 23.83/9.78 Nitpicking formula...
% 23.83/9.78 Timestamp: 07:53:11
% 23.83/9.78 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 23.83/9.78 able to skip some scopes
% 23.83/9.78 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 23.83/9.78 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 23.83/9.78 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 23.83/9.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 23.83/9.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 23.83/9.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 23.83/9.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 23.83/9.78 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 23.83/9.78 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 23.83/9.78 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2:
% 23.83/9.78
% 23.83/9.78 Skolem constants:
% 23.83/9.78 ??.bnd_mbox.Y = i1
% 23.83/9.78 ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i2
% 23.83/9.78 Constants:
% 23.83/9.78 bnd_admin = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 23.83/9.78 bnd_bob = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 23.83/9.78 bnd_deletefile1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)
% 23.83/9.78 bnd_rel =
% 23.83/9.78 (\<lambda>x. _)
% 23.83/9.78 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False),
% 23.83/9.78 i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False))
% 23.83/9.78 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 23.83/9.78 Total time: 632 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------